The Presidential Stock Market Cycle

June 25, 2009 by admin · Leave a Comment 

This is a well-known, though hardly flawless, stock market political cycle. Basically, the stock market’s best performances take place during the years that immediately precede the years of presidential elections. Its second-best annual gains tend to take place during the years of presidential elections, with the stock
market often peaking shortly after the elections held during those years. The worst years for the stock market have been the years following presidential elections. For example, positive stock market returns were achieved during every pre-election year but one since 1948. The same ratio of success has almost existed for election years (although the year 2000 was a notable failure), but gains during election years have not generally been as great as gains achieved during pre-electio years. Post-election years and midterm years have produced only modest nr returns to stockholders throughout the years. In fact, some portfolio manage] maintain portfolios in equities only during years that are normally favorable for the presidential market cycle; they turn to interest-producing instruments during the remainder of the time.
This is, again, an indicator that has been highly reliable over the long run by one that has been prone to error in certain years. For example, the stock mark, advanced during the first year of President Reagan’s second term in office (198E during the first year of President Bush’s term in office (1989), and again during the first years of President Clinton’s two terms of office (1993 and 1997), but the year after election hangover returned with the election of George W. Bush, whose fir full year in office (2001) was marked by a serious extension of the 2000-2002 be market.

Evaluating the Tabulations

June 24, 2009 by admin · Leave a Comment 

Although gains were recorded in most months during both the favorable unfavorable six-month periods, there has been a considerable difference in magnitude of the average gain achieved during favorable seasonal periods unfavorable periods. (Stocks advance approximately 75% of the time but, apparel there are advances and, then again, there are advances.)
Returns during unfavorable six-month periods have averaged just a bit than 1% per period, with the rate of return while invested approximately 2% annum, less than risk-free interest rates in most years. As a rule, investors which have been better off in the stock market for just six months each year and six months than being fully invested at all times (although this is not true for every year, of course).
The performance of this seasonal six-month period timing model has been essentially similar to the Nasdaq/NYSE Index Relative Strength Indicator and the 3- to 5-Year Monetary Indicator, which also produce virtually all net market gain within defined and limited holding periods. These “mood indicators” are not precise on their own in terms of market timing, however, so they are probably best employed as an influential backdrop to inveshnent decisions based upon more specific timing tools or as a consideration for decisions regarding the extent to which you want to be invested at any time.
There certainly do appear to be significant differences in performance between the favorable and unfavorable six-month periods.

« Previous PageNext Page »